Readable English In Your OG Classroom - A Supportive Layer for Confident Reading
Overview
Readable English offers a clear, consistent way to make irregular or unexpected spellings easier to read. It works alongside structured literacy and OG instruction by giving students dependable support when patterns fall outside what they have learned. Nothing in RE replaces phonemic awareness, phonics, or encoding routines already in place. Instead, it strengthens accuracy and confidence as students move into more complex text.
This guide shows simple, practical ways to integrate RE into your current approach so readers can move through print with greater certainty and steady growth in fluency.
Orton-Gillingham (OG) + Readable English
OG instruction gives students clear, direct, systematic teaching in how spoken and written language work, with lessons shaped to each learner’s strengths and needs. Your training and experience allow you to make precise instructional decisions that help students organize and apply the building blocks of reading and writing with growing confidence. You already support readers by marking words, highlighting patterns, and making the code of English as clear as possible. RE fits naturally into this work by offering a consistent way to mark spellings that fall outside common patterns, reinforcing the clarity you already bring to every lesson.
What You'll See in this Guide
This guide will walk you through:
-
How Readable English aligns with Orton-Gillingham and Structured Literacy elements and instructional principles
-
Where the Readable English markup and decoding supports naturally fit into an OG-style or SL-style lesson or curriculum
-
Where to introduce Readable English components and options for how to do so
How can Readable English enhance Orton-Gillingham instruction?
Readable English glyphs can be used as additional supports within an Orton-Gillingham framework. They do not replace OG routines or change instruction. Instead, they give students with dyslexia and other language-based learning disabilities additional clarity during connected-text reading.
1. Reduces Guessing and Builds Accurate Habits
Glyphs draw students’ eyes to the letters that actually carry the sound, interrupting the habit of jumping to conclusions based on the first or last letter. This helps students slow down, attend to the whole word, and stay anchored in print.
2. Improves Generalization and Access to Real Text
Many students who decode well in drills lose accuracy when moving into authentic text. Glyphs provide light support that helps students carry OG skills into science, social studies, and literature. This boosts participation and reduces the gap between controlled and grade-level reading.
3. Lowers Cognitive Load in Multisyllabic and Irregular Words
Longer words and unpredictable spellings increase working memory demands. Glyphs highlight the letters that matter most, steadying sounds for schwa, silent letters, and rare vowel patterns. This support helps students read multisyllabic words with greater confidence.
4. Strengthens Multisyllabic Reading
OG syllable routines give students structure. Glyphs reduce the load of remembering less common vowel sounds, silent letters, or alternate spellings, helping students read longer words with greater confidence.
5. Fits Inside OG Routines and Fades Naturally
Glyphs do not add new rules, change the sequence, or conflict with OG terminology. They simply mark patterns OG already teaches, giving students clarity when they need it. As accuracy increases, glyph support naturally fades, helping students move toward independent reading.
What are the elements of an Orton-Gillingham Lesson?
OG is an approach, not a method or program. There is no OG defined singular scope and sequence or lesson plan template. That being said, almost all OG lesson plans, going back to the Gillingham Manual, have these components.
Sound-Symbol Drills
-
Often includes a phonological/phonemic awareness warm up combined with some variation of the 3-Part Drill
Review of Previously Taught Material
-
Short, accuracy-focused review of phonograms, spelling rules, syllable patterns, red words (“irregular words” taught through multisensory techniques).
New Concept Instruction
-
Teach one new element. Teacher models and students practice through multisensory procedures.
Word-Level Practice
-
Word building/word cards, blending drills, word chains, magnet boards, tapping.
-
Often a mix of real and nonsense words to keep the focus on decoding, not sight memory
Connected Text Reading
-
Controlled word lists → sentences → decodable passages/“controlled text passage reading.”
Encoding / Dictation
-
Sound, word, and sentence dictation
-
Students write using the same patterns they just read, closing the loop between decoding and encoding. This is often complemented by strategies such as Simultaneous Oral Spelling (SOS)
Cumulative Review & Fluency
-
Repeated reading of controlled text, timed or partner reading, wordlists revisited across days.
-
Each day or step spirals back to older concepts, not just that day’s pattern.
The Integrated Lesson: Typical OG Lesson Sequence Enhanced by Readable English
This guide shows where RE fits inside the lesson steps you already use. The “Add In” notes highlight the pieces needed to integrate RE, and the activity suggestions offer optional ways to extend that support based on your students’ needs.
| Orton-Gillingham Lesson Plan Step | Readable English Integration |
|---|---|
Phonemic Awareness
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Visual Drill
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Auditory Drill
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Blending Drill
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Quick Review
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
New Concept
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Guided Practice
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Connected Text
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Spelling / Encoding
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Wrap Up / Fluency
|
Suggested Readable English activities:
|
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need to change my scope and sequence?
No. RE does not replace your sequence or introduce new phonics targets. You keep your existing progression exactly as it is. RE simply gives you a way to make irregular or unpredictable spellings more transparent while you teach the concepts you already plan to teach.
When do glyphs get introduced?
Glyphs are introduced once students have secure knowledge of standard letter–sound correspondences. In practice, this aligns well with OG routines:
-
You begin with your standard phonics sequence.
-
When students start to learn letters that deviate from the standard sounds, you will introduce the glyphs, just like you mark up words.
-
Think of glyphs as coming online as needed rather than all at once.
How can I convert texts?
Teachers or students can easily convert any passage using the RE browser extension or the conversion tool in the platform.
This lets you keep the same decodable lines, dictation sentences, controlled passages, and content-area texts you already use.
Can I still teach concepts like syllable division?
Yes. Your instruction stays the same.
RE does not replace instruction in syllable work, morphology, or OG word analysis. It simply removes guesswork around irregular vowel teams, unexpected pronunciations, and silent-letter patterns so students can focus more on applying the rules you’re teaching.
Students still break words into parts, label syllable types, and practice analytic and synthetic reading. They just do so with clearer access to the pronunciation.
Will students become dependent on the glyphs?
No. Research shows this isn't a concern. Students naturally ignore glyphs for words they've mastered. You can also provide mixed practice with marked and unmarked text, gradually increasing the proportion of Standard English. Monitor fluency and accuracy in Standard English. When students read unmarked text at 95%+ accuracy with good comprehension, they're ready to transition. The fade can be gradual, removing glyphs from familiar words first.
References
Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. (1956–1980). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for students with specific disability in reading, spelling and penmanship (Various editions). Educators Publishing Service.
Orton, S. T. (1925). Word-blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14(6), 581–615.
Orton, S. T. (1937). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. W. W. Norton.
Rawson, M. (1992). The many faces of dyslexia (2nd ed.). International Dyslexia Association.
Rome, P., & Osman, J. (1972). The language toolkit. Educators Publishing Service.
Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. (1956). Developing mastery. In The Gillingham manual. Educators Publishing Service. (Original work published 1956)
Schupack, H., & Wilson, B. (1997). The “R” book: Reading, writing, and spelling — The multisensory structured language approach. International Dyslexia Association.
Henry, M. K., & Brickley, S. (1999). Dyslexia… Samuel T. Orton and his legacy. International Dyslexia Association
.png?width=350&height=60&name=Readable%20English%20Logo%20(1).png)
